Economics
NBA max contract explained: the three tiers and the aprons
What a max contract actually is: 25, 30 and 35 per cent of the cap, the supermax conditions, the 8 versus 5 per cent raise, and how the aprons bite.
By CricketTaken EditorialPublished Economics19 min read
The phrase does more damage than almost any other in basketball reporting. A player is said to have signed "a max contract", and the reader takes away a number. There is no number. There is a percentage, three of them in fact, applied to a salary cap that moves every summer, with a floor underneath and a set of conditions that decide which percentage a given player is allowed to reach.
NBA max contract explained from the agreement itself is a short piece of arithmetic wrapped in a long piece of eligibility law. The arithmetic is in Article II, Section 7 of the collective bargaining agreement. The eligibility law is spread across four more articles and one policy document that is not in the agreement at all. This is all of it, in the order a contract actually gets built.
The maximum is a percentage of the cap, and there are exactly three of them
The agreement does not set a maximum salary. It sets a maximum first-year salary, expressed as a share of the salary cap in effect when the contract is executed, and it does so in three bands keyed to completed Years of Service.
A player who has completed fewer than seven years is limited to 25 per cent of the cap. A player who has completed at least seven but fewer than ten reaches 30 per cent. A player who has completed ten or more reaches 35 per cent.
Then comes the clause that almost every summary drops, and it matters more than it looks. Each tier is written as the greater of the percentage or 105 per cent of the salary for the final season of the player's previous contract.
That second limb is a floor, not a ceiling, and it exists to stop the tier system producing a pay cut. A player finishing a very large deal can be earning more than 25 per cent of the current cap already. Without the floor, a twenty-eight-year-old with six years of service coming off an enormous contract would be forced to accept less money than he made last season in order to sign a so-called maximum. The floor makes the maximum the higher of the two numbers, so a max is never a demotion.
The same three tiers govern renegotiations, measured against the salary for the season before the renegotiated one. The mechanism is identical, and the percentages do not change.
There is one more guard worth knowing about. If a contract contains a trade bonus, and the bonus would push the player's salary plus unlikely bonuses above the applicable maximum in the year of the trade, the bonus is deemed amended downwards by exactly enough to bring him back to the limit. A player at the maximum cannot be paid a trade kicker in any meaningful sense. He can hold one, and it will be quietly reduced to nothing when it is triggered.
Years of service is the only thing that lifts a tier automatically
Everything else in this article is a route around the service-time ladder. The ladder itself is mechanical. A season on an NBA roster earns a year of service, the tiers are counted in completed years, and nothing a player does on the floor makes the clock run faster.
That produces the structural oddity at the heart of NBA pay. The best player in the league in a given season may be twenty-three years old, three years into his career, and legally incapable of being paid more than 25 per cent of the cap. The tenth best player may be thirty-one, eleven years in, and entitled to ask for 35. The agreement is a seniority system with an award-based appeals process bolted on, and the appeals process is what the rest of Section 7 describes.
The Higher Max Criteria: the appeal a young player can win
The agreement defines a set of achievements it calls the Higher Max Criteria, and they are the only things that let a player jump a tier before his service time gets him there.
A player meets them if he was named to the All-NBA first, second or third team, or was named Defensive Player of the Year, either in the immediately preceding season or in two seasons out of the immediately preceding three. He also meets them if he was named Most Valuable Player in any of the three immediately preceding seasons.
Read the two limbs carefully, because they are not symmetrical. All-NBA and Defensive Player of the Year require either a very recent selection or a repeated one: last season, or twice in the last three. MVP requires neither. A single MVP counts for three years afterwards, whatever has happened since.
The first place the criteria bite is the fifth year. A player who has completed four years of service as of the 30 June following the last season of his contract is what the agreement calls a 5th Year Eligible Player. If he has met at least one of the Higher Max Criteria as of the 1 July following his fourth season, he may be paid up to 30 per cent of the cap rather than 25.
One phrase in that clause does enormous work: from his Prior Team. The uplift is available only from the club he is already with. A rival club signing the same player in free agency, however much cap room it has, may not pay him more than 25 per cent. The uplift is not a market rate. It is a retention subsidy, and it is one of the least discussed reasons that young stars stay put.
The rookie scale extension, and the sliding table the agreement prints itself
The other way a young player reaches the uplift is by extending his rookie contract before it expires, and the drafting here is unusually specific.
A first-round pick's rookie scale contract may be extended, and the extension may be written as a percentage of the cap rather than as a dollar amount. Three forms are permitted.
If the player has already met a Higher Max Criterion when the extension is signed, the parties simply agree a percentage, which must be at least 25 and no more than 30.
If he has not yet met one, the extension may be written conditionally: 25 per cent of the cap, or an agreed higher percentage between 25 and 30 if he meets a Higher Max Criterion during the fourth season of his rookie contract. The percentage is fixed in the document; only the trigger is left open.
The third form is the interesting one, because the agreement prints its own example of it. The parties may agree a sliding set of percentages, keyed to which criterion the player satisfies. The illustration written into the text uses an extension whose first extended season is 2024-25, and sets out three rungs.
The extension is then deemed amended on 1 July of the salary cap year covering the first extended season, so that the percentage becomes an actual set of dollar figures based on the cap and the maximum applicable to the player on that date. No incentive compensation may be included in an extension written this way, which removes the obvious loophole of paying the difference as a bonus.
Two length rules bracket all of this. A rookie scale extension may cover up to six seasons in total from the date it is signed, counting the seasons remaining on the original contract. And any deal for a 5th Year Eligible Player that pays more than 25 per cent of the cap has to run for at least four seasons, excluding option years and excluding the last season of the rookie contract in the case of an extension. A club cannot pay the uplift on a short deal and revisit the question in two years.
The Designated Veteran Player rules, which everybody calls the supermax
The 35 per cent tier is normally reached only at ten years of service. The Designated Veteran Player rules are the exception, and they are the most conditional provision in the agreement.
There are two versions of it, and they are not the same instrument.
The Designated Veteran Player Contract is signed by a player who is already a free agent. He must have eight or nine years of service at the time the contract is executed. He must have rendered those years for the team with which he first signed an NBA contract, or, if he has been under contract to more than one team in that period, he must have changed teams only by trade and only during the first four salary cap years in which he was under contract. He must meet at least one of the Higher Max Criteria at the time the contract is executed. Meet all of that, and his prior team may pay him above 30 per cent and up to 35 per cent of the cap, on a contract that covers five seasons.
The Designated Veteran Player Extension is signed by a player still under contract. It has three separate conditions. He must have one season remaining on his contract, or two including any option year. He must have seven or eight years of service when the extension is executed, which the agreement helpfully glosses as a player entering his eighth or ninth NBA year. And he must satisfy the same team-continuity condition: drafted by, or traded to, this club inside his first four salary cap years. The percentage is negotiated, no lower than 30 and no higher than 35.
Three further rules on the extension version are worth having.
It may only be negotiated and entered into during the off-season, which the agreement defines as 1 July through the day before the regular season starts. There is no in-season supermax.
It cannot be signed sooner than the third anniversary of the signing of the underlying contract.
And it must cover six seasons from the date it is signed. Not up to six. Six. The Designated Veteran Player Extension is the only instrument in the agreement with a mandatory length rather than a maximum one, which tells you what it was designed to do.
On top of that, a player who enters either version may not be traded for one year afterwards. The team has bought a six-year commitment it cannot move for twelve months and cannot terminate at all, because NBA contracts are fully guaranteed as a matter of practice at this end of the market.
- Years one to four, the rookie scaleA first-round pick signs a scale contract. Nothing in the maximum salary rules touches him, because his salary is fixed by his draft slot and the team's election within the permitted band.
- The extension window, before year fiveThe team may extend him. If he has already met a Higher Max Criterion the extension can be written at an agreed 25 to 30 per cent of the cap; if not, it can be written conditionally on him meeting one during the fourth season.
- Year five, the first maxIf he reaches free agency instead, he is capped at 25 per cent of the cap from any team, or up to 30 per cent from his prior team if he satisfied the Higher Max Criteria by the July after his fourth season.
- Years eight and nine, the supermax windowNow the Designated Veteran rules open, and only for the club that drafted him or traded for him inside his first four salary cap years. An extension here must run six seasons; a free agent contract runs five.
- Year ten, the tier arrives anywayWith ten completed years of service, 35 per cent of the cap becomes available from any team, with no award criteria and no continuity requirement. The supermax was never a higher number. It was the same number, earlier.
The sequence set out in Article II Section 7 and Article IX Section 1. Years of service are counted as completed seasons.
That last step is the point most coverage misses. The supermax does not pay a player more than the top tier. It pays him the top tier one or two years before service time would have delivered it, in exchange for a six-year commitment to one club. The premium is the timing, not the percentage.
What happens when an extension turns out to be too big
An extension is signed today for a term that begins in two or three years, against a salary cap nobody yet knows. The parties can therefore agree a first-year salary that turns out, on the day it actually starts, to exceed the maximum the player is allowed. The agreement does not void the contract, and it does not send the two sides back to the table. It rewrites the deal by itself, on 1 July of the salary cap year containing the first extended season, and it specifies the order in which the money comes off.
Any signing bonus allocated to that first year is cut first. If that is not enough, or if there is no signing bonus to cut, likely and unlikely bonuses in that year come down next, reduced pro rata across whatever bonuses exist. Base compensation is reduced last, and only if the first two cuts have failed to bring the figure within the limit.
Then the knock-on runs forward. If a signing bonus allocation is halved in the first year, every later year's allocation is halved as well. If base compensation is reduced, the later seasons are reset so the annual increases still comply with the raise limits measured against the amended first year.
Three things follow from that ordering. Reductions land on the most contingent money first and on guaranteed base salary last, which is the players' side of the drafting rather than the clubs'. Every later season moves when the first one moves, because the raise ladder is defined off year one and nothing else. And an agent negotiating a long-dated extension is in substance negotiating a percentage, since the dollar figure written on the page will be rewritten by the agreement itself if the cap does not land where both sides guessed it would.
The 8 per cent against 5 per cent difference, and why it is not what you think
The raise rules sit in Article VII, Section 5(a), and they contain a detail that is misreported constantly.
A contract between a qualifying or early qualifying veteran free agent and his prior team may increase or decrease the player's salary each year by up to 8 per cent. Every other contract is limited to 5 per cent. Extensions get 8 per cent; extensions signed as part of a trade are pushed back down to 5.
Here is the detail. The 8 per cent is 8 per cent of the first season's salary, not 8 per cent of the previous season's salary. The increases are linear, not compounding. A five-year deal at the maximum raise does not run 100, 108, 116.6, 126, 136. It runs 100, 108, 116, 124, 132. The same is true at 5 per cent: 100, 105, 110, 115.
That flattens the back end of every large NBA contract relative to what people assume, and it is the reason a max signed four years ago consumes a smaller share of the cap each year while the cap keeps rising. The salary grows arithmetically. The cap grows geometrically, or at least it has done.
Set the two ladders against each other with a constructed round number and the retention advantage is easy to see.
Across four seasons the constructed deals are worth $179.2m and $172m, a gap of $7.2m. That is real but not decisive, and if the raise difference were the whole story, players would move far more often than they do.
The term rule is what makes it decisive. A player re-signing with his prior team as a qualifying veteran free agent may sign for five seasons. Everyone else is limited to four. Add the fifth year at $52.8m to the constructed example and the incumbent's offer totals $232m against $172m, a difference of $60m on the same starting salary.
That is the whole soft cap in one comparison. The agreement does not stop a rival club matching the first-year salary. It stops the rival club matching the shape, and the shape is where the money is. The rest of the retention machinery, the qualifying offer, the right of first refusal and the two days that decide most restricted free agencies, is set out in the piece on how the free agency window actually runs.
- 5Maximum seasons, re-signing with your prior team
- 4Maximum seasons, signing with any other team
- 6Maximum total seasons, rookie scale extension
- 6Mandatory seasons, designated veteran extension
Article IX, Section 1. All lengths are inclusive of any option year.
The aprons are the part that changed, and they are not payroll caps
The 2023 agreement introduced two lines above the luxury tax, and they are the newest and most misunderstood constraint on any team paying maximum salaries.
Start with how they are calculated, because it is not what most explanations say. The Tax Level is 121.5 per cent of the salary cap. For the 2023-24 season the First Apron Level was set as the tax level plus an indexed amount derived from $6.716m, and the Second Apron Level as the tax level plus $17.5m. From then on, both apron levels move by a simple ratio: the apron for a given year equals the 2023-24 apron multiplied by that year's cap divided by the 2023-24 cap. They track the cap, not the tax line, and they do not need renegotiating each summer.
Now the mechanism, which is where almost everyone goes wrong. Neither apron is a limit on payroll. A team may spend past both and keep spending. What each apron does is switch off transactions.
The agreement contains a Transaction Restrictions Table listing eleven moves. Each is tagged with an Applicable Apron Level, and the rule has two limbs. A team may not do the transaction if, immediately afterwards, its apron team salary would exceed the tagged level. And a team that does the transaction may not exceed that level for the remainder of the salary cap year. The apron is therefore a hard cap that a club chooses to accept in exchange for a specific move, not a ceiling imposed on it in advance.
Tagged to the first apron are the bi-annual exception, the non-taxpayer mid-level exception, acquiring a player through a sign-and-trade, signing a player who was waived during the season while earning more than the non-taxpayer mid-level, and several classes of traded player exception used after the season in which they arose.
Tagged to the second apron are the aggregated traded player exception, which is the mechanism for combining two salaries in a trade, paying cash to another team in a trade, acquiring a player through a traded player exception created by a sign-and-trade, and signing anyone with the taxpayer mid-level exception.
There is a further extension in the off-season. For several of those rows, a team that uses the mechanism after the regular season ends is bound not only for the current year but through the following salary cap year as well, so a July decision constrains a February deadline eighteen months later.
The apron figure itself is not the payroll figure. Apron team salary is calculated differently from team salary, with certain deductions removed and certain holds added, so a club can be under the tax on one measure and closer to a line than it looks on the other. The full set of consequences above the higher line, including the effect on future draft picks, is worked through in the article on what the second apron takes away.
Why three maximum salaries and an apron cannot coexist comfortably
Put the two halves of this article together and the arithmetic is unforgiving, and it can be done without knowing a single dollar figure.
Three maximum contracts at the three tiers would consume 25, 30 and 35 per cent of the cap in their first seasons. That is 90 per cent of the salary cap for three players. The tax level sits at 121.5 per cent of the cap and the second apron sits above that. Fill the remaining eleven or twelve roster spots even at minimum salaries and a three-max roster is pressed against the higher line by construction, not by mismanagement.
Two things soften it slightly and one thing sharpens it.
The softeners: maximum salaries are set against the cap in the year the contract is executed and then grow by a flat percentage of the first year, while the aprons index to the current cap. A max signed three summers ago is a smaller share of today's cap than it was on the day it was signed. And no team is obliged to have players in all three tiers.
The sharpener is the timing. A club that assembles three maximum players will typically have signed them in different summers, so its three deals expire in different summers too, and it never reaches a natural reset point. That is the trap the aprons were designed to set, and the reason apron-driven trades now happen a year before the basketball case for them appears.
The availability gate that sits in front of all of it
One more document controls whether any of the award-based routes above are even available, and it is not in Article II.
The agreement makes a player ineligible for MVP, Defensive Player of the Year, Most Improved Player, All-NBA and All-Defensive selection unless he played at least 65 regular season games, with a game counting only if he was on the floor for at least 20 minutes. There is a narrow alternative for a player who reaches 62 games, had appeared in at least 85 per cent of his team's games to that point, and then suffers a season-ending injury.
Since All-NBA selection, Defensive Player of the Year and MVP are precisely the Higher Max Criteria, the games-played rule is a gate in front of the 30 per cent uplift and in front of the entire Designated Veteran mechanism. A player who misses too many games in the wrong season does not merely lose an award. He loses the qualification that would have moved his next contract by five percentage points of the cap across five or six seasons, and there is no retrospective route back to it. How that rule interacts with the league's separate participation policy, and why the two documents pull in opposite directions, is the subject of the piece on what the load management rules actually say.
There is even a formal appeal. A player may bring an Award Eligibility Grievance against his own club, arguing by clear and convincing evidence that it deliberately held his minutes or games down to make him ineligible. If he wins, the only remedy is that he is deemed eligible. The existence of that clause tells you the parties expected clubs to be tempted, which is a remarkable thing for two negotiating sides to write down together.
What the max costs the player, which nobody says out loud
The maximum salary is a restraint on the highest earners and only on them. Almost every player in the league is paid below any of the three ceilings, so for them the tiers are theoretical. For the handful at the top, the tier is a hard limit on what an open market would have paid.
The effect is a transfer. Money that would flow to five or ten players in a genuinely open market is redistributed across the middle of the roster, because the players' share of revenue is fixed by the agreement and has to be paid out to somebody. That is the deal the union has repeatedly signed, and the reason it signs it is that its median member is far better off under a maximum than without one.
It also produces the one genuinely reliable bargain in team building. A player capped at 25 per cent of the cap who is worth 40 per cent is the most valuable asset in the sport, and the four or five seasons in which a club holds him at that price are the window in which almost every contender is actually built. The draft is the entry point to that window, which is why teams behave the way they do about lottery position, a subject covered in the article on how the draft order is decided.
Reading a reported max deal in ninety seconds
The next time a maximum contract is reported, six questions turn the headline into information, and all six can be answered from public facts.
Which tier is it? Count the player's completed years of service. Fewer than seven means 25 per cent, seven to nine means 30, ten or more means 35. If the reported number implies a higher tier than his service time allows, either an award criterion or the 105 per cent floor is doing the work.
Is it from his own team, or from a rival? The 30 per cent uplift for a fifth-year player and the whole Designated Veteran mechanism are available only from the prior team. A rival cannot match them at any price.
How long is it? Five seasons means he re-signed with his own club. Four means he moved. Six means it is a rookie scale extension or a designated veteran extension, and the latter had no choice about the number.
What are the raises? Eight per cent of year one means the incumbent kept him. Five per cent means he changed clubs, or was extended as part of a trade.
Where does it put the team against the aprons? Not against the cap, which contenders left behind long ago, and not only against the tax. The question is which specific transactions the club has just given up for the next two summers.
Did he play sixty-five games? If not, and if the deal depends on an award criterion, look again, because something else in the structure is carrying it.
Those six checks work on any reported deal in any summer without a single insider source, and they will tell you more about a club's next three seasons than the headline figure ever does. The wider machinery they sit inside, the exceptions, the holds, the tax bands and the tactical consequences of paying three players 90 per cent of a cap, runs across the basketball archive and starts with the way the cap itself is calculated.
Common questions
What is a max contract in the NBA?
A max contract is a deal that pays the largest first-year salary the collective bargaining agreement allows for that player. The limit is set as a percentage of the salary cap rather than as a dollar figure, so the value of a max changes every year with the cap. There are three percentages, 25, 30 and 35, and which one applies depends on how many years of service the player has completed.
How much is an NBA max contract worth?
It depends on the salary cap in the year the contract is executed and on the player's service time, so there is no fixed number. A player with fewer than seven years of service is limited to 25 per cent of the cap in the first season, seven to nine years reaches 30 per cent, and ten or more reaches 35 per cent. The current cap figure is published by the league each year, and multiplying it by the relevant percentage gives the first-year salary.
What is the NBA supermax?
The supermax is the informal name for the Designated Veteran Player Contract and the Designated Veteran Player Extension. It lets a player with eight or nine years of service be paid up to 35 per cent of the cap by his own team, several years before service time alone would allow it, provided he has been with that team since his first contract or was traded to it during his first four salary cap years, and provided he has won MVP, Defensive Player of the Year or an All-NBA place within a defined recent window.
Why do NBA players earn more by re-signing with their own team?
Two rules in the agreement favour the incumbent. A player re-signing with his prior team as a qualifying free agent can take annual raises of 8 per cent of his first-year salary, where a player signing elsewhere is limited to 5 per cent. He can also sign for five seasons with his own team rather than four with a new one. Together those two differences are worth a substantial sum across the life of the deal.
Can an NBA team have more than one max contract?
Yes. Nothing in the agreement limits the number of maximum contracts a team may carry, and several teams carry two or three. What limits them is the cap arithmetic and the apron rules: three maximum first-year salaries at the three tiers would consume 90 per cent of the cap between them, leaving the rest of the roster to be filled with exceptions and minimums.
Filed under Basketball·nba · salary cap · contracts · cba · roster building