
- IPL runs
- 5
- Average
- 2.50
- Strike rate
- 35.7
- Highest
- 4
Overview
What the figures show
Parvinder Awana is in the IPL books with the ball: 39 wickets from roughly 125 overs, conceded at an economy rate of 8.27.
Every one of those seasons was played for Punjab Kings. That is a wicket every 19 balls. An economy rate of 8.27 is all but level with the 8.17 median for the 102 bowlers here with 300 or more IPL balls.
Questions
About Parvinder Awana
How many IPL runs has Parvinder Awana scored?
Parvinder Awana has scored 5 runs in the IPL across 2 seasons, averaging 2.5 at a strike rate of 35.71. The highest score is 4.
How many IPL wickets has Parvinder Awana taken?
Parvinder Awana has taken 39 IPL wickets at an economy rate of 8.27 and an average of 26.38.
Which IPL teams has Parvinder Awana played for?
Parvinder Awana has appeared for Punjab Kings in the IPL.
What is Parvinder Awana's playing style?
Parvinder Awana is a right-hand bat who bowls right-arm fast medium, listed as a bowler.
Also on CricketTaken
Players alongside Parvinder Awana
Team-mates from this player's IPL seasons first, then others from the same country.
How this page was worked out
Where these figures come from
Sources for this profile
- IPL figures computed from ball-by-ball records of 1,243 IPL matches.
- Date of birth, playing style and photograph come from a third-party player feed, matched by name.
How the numbers are derived
- A wide is not a ball faced; a no ball is.
- Byes and leg byes are not charged to the bowler; wides and no balls are.
- Six kinds of dismissal are credited to a bowler. A run out is not one of them.
- An average is runs over dismissals, and is left blank rather than shown as infinite.
- Every rule in full →
What this page does not cover
- Only the competitions named above. A record elsewhere in this player’s career is not counted here and is not implied by these totals.
- No international career record is held for this player on this site.
- Ball-by-ball coverage of Test cricket begins in 2001 and of ODIs in 2002.
- A figure here that looks wrong is worth reporting — how to report it.