
- IPL runs
- 51
- Average
- 5.67
- Strike rate
- 91.1
- Highest
- 20
Overview
What the figures show
Bowling is where Shivam Mavi's IPL figures sit: 30 wickets between 2018 and 2022 at 31.40 each.
Every one of those seasons was played for Kolkata Knight Riders. There is no IPL cricket on the record in 2019. That is a wicket every 22 balls. At 8.71 an over that is 0.54 more than the 8.17 median among the 102 bowlers who have sent down 300 or more IPL balls.
Questions
About Shivam Mavi
How many IPL runs has Shivam Mavi scored?
Shivam Mavi has scored 51 runs in the IPL across 4 seasons, averaging 5.67 at a strike rate of 91.07. The highest score is 20.
How many IPL wickets has Shivam Mavi taken?
Shivam Mavi has taken 30 IPL wickets at an economy rate of 8.71 and an average of 31.4.
Which IPL teams has Shivam Mavi played for?
Shivam Mavi has appeared for Kolkata Knight Riders in the IPL.
What is Shivam Mavi's playing style?
Shivam Mavi is a right-hand bat who bowls right-arm fast medium, listed as a bowler.
Also on CricketTaken
Players alongside Shivam Mavi
Team-mates from this player's IPL seasons first, then others from the same country.
How this page was worked out
Where these figures come from
Sources for this profile
- IPL figures computed from ball-by-ball records of 1,243 IPL matches.
- Date of birth, playing style and photograph come from a third-party player feed, matched by name.
How the numbers are derived
- A wide is not a ball faced; a no ball is.
- Byes and leg byes are not charged to the bowler; wides and no balls are.
- Six kinds of dismissal are credited to a bowler. A run out is not one of them.
- An average is runs over dismissals, and is left blank rather than shown as infinite.
- Every rule in full →
What this page does not cover
- Only the competitions named above. A record elsewhere in this player’s career is not counted here and is not implied by these totals.
- No international career record is held for this player on this site.
- Ball-by-ball coverage of Test cricket begins in 2001 and of ODIs in 2002.
- A figure here that looks wrong is worth reporting — how to report it.