Skip to content
CricketTaken

India vs Australia Rivalry: The Border-Gavaskar Story

13 min read2,795 words

On the morning of the fourth day at Eden Gardens in March 2001, India were still batting after being asked to follow on, and the ground was filling up faster than the turnstiles could count. Australia had won sixteen Test matches in a row. Two men were at the crease who had no business still being there. What happened over the next thirty hours reset the relationship between the two best sides of the era, and everything the fixture has become since traces back to it.

The Border-Gavaskar Trophy is now the contest the rest of the cricket world schedules around. It was not always, and the route from a one-off Test in Delhi to that status is worth setting out properly.

Before the trophy

The two countries first played each other in 1947-48, when a young Indian side toured Australia and was comprehensively beaten by a team containing Don Bradman in his final home season. For the next four decades the fixture was intermittent and lopsided in Australia's favour away from home, and closer in India, where spin and heat did the work.

Two series stand out from that era.

In 1969-70 Australia won in India, and then did not win a series there again for thirty-five years, which became one of the great standing statistics of the rivalry.

In September 1986 at Chennai, the two sides played the second tied Test in the history of the game, and the only one involving India. Dean Jones made a double century in conditions that put him in hospital afterwards. The match ended with India's last pair needing a run and the scores level. Nothing about that game suggested a rivalry was forming; it simply produced one of the finest Tests ever played.

The trophy itself

The Border-Gavaskar Trophy was instituted in 1996-97, named for Allan Border and Sunil Gavaskar, two batters who between them had held the record for most Test runs. The first contest was a single Test at Delhi, which India won.

Since then the sides have met in close to twenty series. The format has settled into four or five Tests, played home and away on a roughly two-year cycle, and the trophy stays with the holder if a series is drawn.

2001: the series that changed it

Australia arrived under Steve Waugh with fifteen consecutive Test wins behind them and won the first Test at Mumbai to make it sixteen. The tour was being discussed in terms of whether India could avoid a whitewash.

At Eden Gardens, Australia made 445 in the first innings, Waugh himself scoring a hundred. Harbhajan Singh took a hat-trick in that innings, dismissing Ricky Ponting, Adam Gilchrist and Shane Warne, the first hat-trick by an Indian in Test cricket. India were then bowled out for 171 and asked to follow on.

What followed was the third instance in Test history of a side winning after being made to follow on. VVS Laxman made 281, batting at number three after being promoted, and Rahul Dravid made 180. They batted together through the whole of the fourth day. India declared at 657 for 7, and Harbhajan, who finished with thirteen wickets in the match, bowled Australia out for 212. India won by 171 runs.

India took the third Test at Chennai to win the series 2-1. Australia's winning streak was over, Laxman's 281 was then the highest score by an Indian in a Test, and a generation of Indian cricketers grew up with the idea that Australia could be beaten by being outlasted rather than out-muscled.

The grounds that staged those matches, and what their surfaces have traditionally done, are covered in the guide to India's iconic cricket stadiums.

2003-04 and 2004-05: the return legs

India toured Australia in 2003-04 and drew the series 1-1, which at the time felt like a win. Dravid made 233 and an unbeaten 72 at Adelaide to set up India's only victory of the series. Sachin Tendulkar made an unbeaten 241 at Sydney in Steve Waugh's final Test, an innings famous for the shot he refused to play rather than the ones he did.

The following season Australia came to India and won 2-1, their first series victory there since 1969-70. Adam Gilchrist captained for part of it in Ponting's absence, Michael Clarke made a hundred on debut at Bengaluru, and Damien Martyn played the spin better than anyone on either side. India won the final Test at Mumbai on a surface that finished inside three days. That series remains Australia's most recent series win in India.

The SCG, January 2008

The second Test of the 2007-08 series in Australia is the most contested episode in the rivalry's history, and it is best stated as a matter of record rather than of opinion.

During the match, the on-field umpires reported Harbhajan Singh under the ICC Code of Conduct following a complaint from the Australian captain, Ricky Ponting, that Harbhajan had directed a racial insult at Andrew Symonds. The match referee, Mike Procter, heard the charge and found it proven, imposing a three-Test ban.

India appealed and, with the tour in doubt, the squad gathered in Adelaide rather than travelling on to the next fixture. The appeal was heard by Justice John Hansen, a former New Zealand High Court judge. Hansen found the racial charge not proven on the evidence available. The charge was replaced with a lesser Code of Conduct offence covering abuse and insult not amounting to racism, to which Harbhajan pleaded guilty, and the ban was replaced by a fine of half his match fee. The tour continued.

The same Test produced a series of disputed umpiring decisions, and Steve Bucknor, one of the umpires standing, was replaced for the following Test at Perth after the Indian board objected. India won that Perth Test. Australia took the series 2-1.

Two points are worth making without editorialising. The first is that the appeal outcome is a matter of public record and neither party accepted the other's account of what was said. The second is that Harbhajan and Symonds were subsequently team-mates in the franchise league, and both spoke publicly about having moved past it. Our IPL dataset records Symonds across four seasons from 2008, with 974 runs at an average of 36.07 including a century, and Harbhajan across fourteen seasons with 127 wickets at an economy rate of 6.96.

2018-19: the first series win in Australia

India had toured Australia eleven times before 2018 and had never won a Test series there. Under Virat Kohli they won 2-1.

The series is remembered for Cheteshwar Pujara, who made three centuries and 521 runs, batting for extraordinary lengths of time and taking the shine off the ball for the batters who followed. India won at Adelaide, lost at Perth on a fast new surface, won at Melbourne and drew a rain-affected Sydney Test in which Rishabh Pant made an unbeaten 159 and India enforced the follow-on in Australia for the first time.

The caveat everyone attached at the time was that Australia were without two of their leading batters, who were serving suspensions. That is true and it is on the record. It does not alter the fact that India's bowling attack took twenty wickets three times in a series in Australia, which no previous Indian side had managed.

2020-21: the Gabba

The next tour was, by any measure, the strangest and the best.

The collapse and what followed

India were bowled out for 36 in the second innings at Adelaide, their lowest total in Test cricket, and lost inside three days. Kohli returned home on paternity leave. Injuries removed most of the first-choice bowling attack over the following weeks.

Under Ajinkya Rahane, who made 112, India won at Melbourne. At Sydney they saved a Test that looked lost, with Hanuma Vihari and Ravichandran Ashwin batting out the closing session while both were carrying injuries.

The chase

At the Gabba, where Australia had not lost a Test in thirty-two years, India fielded a bowling attack with a handful of caps between them, conceded a first-innings lead, and then chased 328 on the final day to win by three wickets. Shubman Gill made 91, Pujara absorbed a fearful amount of short bowling for 56, and Rishabh Pant finished unbeaten on 89. In the first innings, Washington Sundar and Shardul Thakur had put on a stand that kept India in the match at all.

India won the series 2-1 and retained the trophy. It is difficult to name a more improbable result in modern Test cricket.

The series since

The fixture has stayed at the top of the calendar. India won at home in 2022-23. Australia beat India in the World Test Championship final at The Oval in 2023. Australia then won at home in 2024-25 to take the trophy back after a decade, with Jasprit Bumrah taking wickets at a rate that made him the outstanding bowler of the series regardless of the result.

Alongside the Tests sits a limited-overs record that has been overwhelmingly Australia's. They beat India in the World Cup final at Johannesburg in 2003 and again in the final at Ahmedabad in 2023, where Travis Head made 137 in front of the largest crowd ever to watch a cricket match. Indian supporters who dominate the Test narrative tend to skip past those two evenings.

Landmark Where What happened
Tied Test, 1986 Chennai Second tie in Test history; scores level, India's last pair at the crease
Trophy instituted, 1996-97 Delhi Single Test, won by India; named for Border and Gavaskar
Eden Gardens, 2001 Kolkata India won after following on; Laxman 281, Dravid 180, Harbhajan 13 wickets
Sydney, 2004 Sydney Tendulkar 241 not out in Steve Waugh's final Test
Series in India, 2004-05 India Australia's most recent series win in India
Sydney, 2008 Sydney Code of Conduct charge, appeal, and the tour continuing
Adelaide to Sydney, 2018-19 Australia India's first Test series win in Australia; Pujara 521 runs
The Gabba, 2021 Brisbane India chased 328 to end a 32-year unbeaten home run

The Australians who came to play here

The franchise league changed the rivalry in a way nobody planned. Players who had spent a decade trying to intimidate each other spent six weeks a year in the same dressing room, and the effect on the tone of the contest has been real.

What our data records

Our IPL dataset records 83 Australian cricketers with at least one league season, the second-largest national group after India's 322. Some of them shaped the competition's early identity outright.

Player Span in our data Record in our dataset
David Warner 2009 to 2024 6,565 runs at 40.52, strike rate 139.77, four hundreds, 62 fifties
Shane Watson 2008 to 2020 3,874 runs at 30.99 and 61 wickets
Glenn Maxwell 2012 to 2025 2,819 runs at a strike rate of 155.15
Steve Smith 2012 to 2021 2,485 runs at 34.51
Adam Gilchrist 2008 to 2013 2,069 runs at a strike rate of 138.39, two hundreds
Michael Hussey 2008 to 2015 1,977 runs at 38.76
Matthew Hayden 2008 to 2010 1,107 runs at 36.90
Shane Warne 2008 to 2011 57 wickets at 25.39, economy 7.27
Mitchell Johnson 2013 to 2018 60 wickets at 24.87
Josh Hazlewood 2022 to 2026 60 wickets at 22.35
Pat Cummins Delhi, Kolkata, Hyderabad 42 wickets at 31.57

Warne captained Rajasthan Royals to the title in the competition's first year, and our season data for 2008 records Watson as player of the tournament and Shaun Marsh as the leading run-scorer with 616. The following season Gilchrist led Deccan Chargers to the title and was named player of the tournament, with Hayden the leading scorer. In 2013, our data has Hussey as the leading run-scorer with 733 for Chennai Super Kings and Watson again as player of the tournament. Warner spent most of his league career with Sunrisers Hyderabad and, on our figures, is the highest-scoring overseas batter the competition has had.

Ricky Ponting is the exception that proves how badly the formats can diverge. Our data records him across a handful of innings for 91 runs. He later coached a franchise for years and was far more successful at that.

Why it has overtaken the Ashes

The claim needs care, because the two things being compared are not the same kind of object.

The case for the older rivalry

The Ashes has history nothing else can touch. Our own Ashes dataset records 340 Tests across 72 series, beginning in 1882-83, with Australia ahead on both series and matches won and a very large number of draws. No other rivalry has that depth of record.

The case for the newer one

What the Border-Gavaskar Trophy has is everything else.

  • Audience. The Indian television and streaming market dwarfs every other cricket market combined. A Test between India and Australia is watched by more people than any other Test.
  • Quality of contest. Since 2001, the series has been genuinely competitive in both countries, which the Ashes has often not been. Away wins in this fixture are difficult and have happened.
  • Contrast of conditions. Turning surfaces at home against pace and bounce away produces a far starker examination than two countries with broadly similar pitches.
  • Stakes. The World Test Championship gave the fixture a competition to feed into, and both sides have generally been at or near the top of it.
  • Player crossover. Because Australians have played here for two decades, the personalities in the contest are known to Indian audiences in a way English players are not.

The counter-argument is straightforward: the Ashes is played every two years without fail, has an unbroken narrative since the nineteenth century, and does not depend on both sides being good. The Ashes hub sets out that record in full. Both things can be true. The older rivalry is the more historic; the newer one is the bigger event, and has been for some time.

There is one further comparison worth making. The most emotionally charged fixture in Indian cricket is not this one, as the India-Pakistan rivalry guide explains. But that fixture is now almost entirely limited-overs and tournament-bound. For Test cricket, this is the one, and it has been since a Thursday in Kolkata in 2001.

Following it

The Tests are the point, and the two away tours are the interesting ones. Watch how each side's spinners are used in the other's conditions, watch the second new ball in Australia and the first hour after lunch in India, and watch whether the visiting batters are still playing the same way in the fourth Test as they were in the first. That last one usually decides it.

The wider Indian game sits on the cricket in India hub, the franchise competition that brought the two sets of players together is on the IPL hub, the traditions on either side of the contest are covered in cricket around the world, and the Australian summer's centrepiece has its own guide in the Boxing Day Test at the MCG.

Sources and method

Match details are drawn from published Test scorecards and contemporaneous reports of the series described. The account of the January 2008 Sydney Test follows the documented sequence of charge, hearing, appeal and outcome, including Justice John Hansen's finding that the racial charge was not proven and the substitution of a lesser Code of Conduct offence and a fine; where the parties' accounts of the incident differ, no version is endorsed here. Series counts for the Border-Gavaskar Trophy are given approximately because the fixture list is still being added to. Ashes totals are computed from our own Ashes dataset, which records 340 Tests across 72 series from 1882-83 and is not represented as complete to the present day. All franchise-career figures are computed from our own IPL dataset, which aggregates season-by-season batting and bowling records for players with a recorded league appearance; bowling coverage in the earliest seasons is less complete than batting coverage, and these totals are ours rather than an official record. This site is independent and has no affiliation with the BCCI, Cricket Australia, the ICC, the IPL or any ground.