Prabhsimran Singh Took Six Years to Become Obvious
Prabhsimran SinghIndia
By CricketTaken EditorialPublished Player analysis5 min read
Punjab Kings first picked Prabhsimran Singh ahead of the 2019 season, when he was 18. For the four seasons that followed he was, by any reasonable measure, not good enough — a wicketkeeper-batter who got occasional games, played some spectacular strokes, got out playing others, and returned figures that would have seen most players released.
They kept him. In 2022 they bought him back for sixty lakh, a nominal fee. In 2024 he made 334 runs in fourteen matches, which is a serviceable season and not a good one. Then they retained him ahead of the 2025 mega auction — a decision that attracted a certain amount of eyebrow-raising — and he made 549 runs at a strike rate of 160.62, the most productive campaign of his career and the first time he had passed 500. He followed it with 510 runs in 2026, again the most for the franchise.
The argument here is not that Prabhsimran is a great player; five hundred runs in a season is very good and is not greatness. It is that his career is one of the clearest recent illustrations of something the IPL's economics normally make impossible: what happens when a franchise decides to wait for a young batter instead of buying a finished one.
The long thin start
The years between 2019 and 2023 do not make a flattering read and there is no reason to soften them. Prabhsimran was picked as a young keeper-batter from Punjab with a reputation for hitting the ball a long way, and for several seasons that was more or less all the evidence there was. He played in scattered matches, was in and out of the eleven, and produced the sort of returns that get a player labelled as raw — which, accurately, he was.
The single innings that changed the internal conversation came in May 2023, when he made 103 from 65 balls against Delhi Capitals, taking Punjab to 167 for 7 after they had been put in, and effectively knocking Delhi out of the tournament. It was his first IPL century and the first evidence that his hitting could carry a whole innings rather than a cameo.
In 2024 he was Punjab's most reliable presence at the top of an order that had no settled shape at all — he never had a regular partner for a full season — and got through the year on the strength of good starts rather than large scores.
What 2025 actually looked like
The season that vindicated the retention had a specific character worth describing, because it was not simply a case of a young hitter finding form.
Punjab opened with Prabhsimran and Priyansh Arya, an IPL debutant, which meant a franchise fielding two uncapped Indian openers in a competition where nearly every serious side buys at least one overseas batter for the top of the order. It was a genuine strategic risk, and it paid. Prabhsimran made 549 runs at 160.62, became the first Punjab batter to record four consecutive fifty-plus scores in a season, and made 91 in a total of 236 against Lucknow Super Giants at Dharamsala. Punjab reached the final.
Two things stood out about the method. The first was that he stopped needing the ball in his slot. Much of his earlier hitting had depended on width or length he could free his arms at; by 2025 he was scoring against straighter lines and taking on good bowlers rather than waiting for bad ones. The second was tempo control — a striker at 160 across a full season is not hitting every ball, he is choosing which overs to attack, and choosing correctly.
The 2026 season, another 510 runs and again the franchise's leading scorer, is the more valuable piece of evidence. One heavy season can be a purple patch. Two consecutive ones from an opener is a level.
Why the patience was unusual
Franchise Twenty20 economics push relentlessly against this kind of development. A team has fourteen matches to win a competition, and the marginal cost of a young player learning on the job is measured in lost games. The rational move is almost always to buy a proven batter and let somebody else's academy do the developing, which is why the auction market for Indian players with two good seasons behind them is so violently expensive.
Punjab had reason to be less patient than most. They have historically been among the competition's least stable franchises — frequent captaincy changes, high squad turnover, a long stretch without a playoff appearance — and a side in that position is usually the first to give up on a project player.
That they did not is the interesting bit. The retention ahead of the 2025 mega auction, at a fee of around four crore, was a bet that the batter they had watched for six seasons in training and in fragments of matches was better than his statistics. That is a scouting judgement rather than a statistical one, and it is the sort of call franchises get wrong far more often than right — Venkatesh Iyer's record-breaking valuation at the same auction is the cautionary version.
The wicketkeeping, and where the record is incomplete
Prabhsimran is listed as a wicketkeeper-batter and keeps for Punjab in domestic cricket, but his IPL value has been almost entirely as an opener; the gloves have generally gone elsewhere in the franchise's stronger sides. That matters for how his career develops, because a top-order batter who can keep is a much more flexible squad asset than one who cannot, and the IPL most wicketkeeper dismissals list is not where his name is going to appear.
The other genuine gap is international cricket. He has represented India at under-19 and India A level and has been on the fringe of selection conversations, but the India top order in white-ball cricket is the most contested set of places in the game. Two heavy IPL seasons is a good argument and not a decisive one against the incumbents.
What the case is evidence of
The standard story about Indian Twenty20 talent is that the league discovers players — a young batter has one enormous night, gets a national call-up, and the pipeline works. That happens, and it is the version that gets televised.
Prabhsimran's career is the less visible version, and probably the more common one for players who actually last. He was not discovered; he was retained, repeatedly, through years in which the evidence did not support it, by a franchise willing to treat his ceiling as more relevant than his current figures. Six seasons of mediocre output preceded two seasons of 500-plus runs, and the second thing does not exist without somebody funding the first.
Whether he becomes an India regular is unresolved and depends on things outside his control. What is settled is that Punjab Kings now have, in a competition where such a thing is close to unbuyable, a homegrown Indian opener who strikes at 160 across a full season — and they have him because they were willing to be wrong about him for four years first.